Good: http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/health/e-coli-soy-nut-butter-recall-cdc/index.html
The video is well-made from start to finish, with good background music that sets the mood for the video. It has good visuals, cutting between different shots of the narrator and picture examples of what the narrator is explaining. Visuals added in, like the background photos and words on screen, provide further understanding and reiterate what the narrator is saying to help the audience gain more of a grasp of the message.
Bad: http://blog.seattlepi.com/huskies/2010/04/07/dubs-wins-ncaa-pet-mascot-tournament/
The video is very bad quality as the camera is constantly shaking and turning as the reporter is walking around. The reporter talks quietly into the camera and does not provide much more information on the story with his narration. The subject is also not always in the frame, let alone centered on screen.
No comments:
Post a Comment